Link: Thomson Reuters wins an early court battle over AI, copyright, and fair use

Judge Stephanos Bibas of the US District Court of Delaware ruled in favor of Thomson Reuters in a notable copyright infringement lawsuit against Ross Intelligence. The lawsuit, pivotal in the debate over AI tools and the use of copyrighted content, concluded that Ross's use of Westlaw content was not covered under "fair use."

Ross Intelligence, which ceased operations in 2021 due to financial difficulties worsened by this legal battle, was found guilty of directly copying from Westlaw to train its AI. This decision emphasizes the protective boundaries of copyrighted editorial content.

Thomson Reuters argued successfully that Ross’s actions significantly affected the market for their product. Judge Bibas highlighted that the AI startup's use of the data created a direct competitor, undermining the Westlaw platform.

Ross’s defense failed to convince the judge, particularly concerning the way it processed copyrighted headnotes into data for its AI algorithms. The court found clear evidence of copying, which no reasonable jury could overlook.

In response, Thomson Reuters expressed satisfaction with the ruling, reinforcing their stance on the sanctity of their copyright and content. The implications of this case stretch beyond Ross, touching on broader legal challenges faced by AI companies like OpenAI and Microsoft.

The outcomes of similar ongoing legal disputes could set significant precedents regarding AI and copyrighted data usage, shaping future innovations and their compliance with copyright laws. #

--

Yoooo, this is a quick note on a link that made me go, WTF? Find all past links here.